CITY OF HUDSON COMMON
COUNCIL
MEETING MINUTES OF
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2006
Meeting called to order by Council President Scot O’Malley in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 7:02 p.m. He announced that he would still be voting on issues and representing the citizens in Aldermanic District 5.
Council President O’Malley led those assembled in the Pledge of
Allegiance.
PRESENT: Alderpersons Randy Morrissette, Dennis
O’Connell, Paul Radermacher, Lee Wyland, Scot O’Malley and Carah Koch.
ABSENT: Mayor Breault was excused.
OTHERS
PRESENT: Devin
Willi, Catherine Munkittrick, Dennis Darnold, Betty Caruso, Angela Popenhagen,
Jim Eulberg, Gordon Conard, Don Christoffersen, Jim Frye, Shelly Johnson, Joan
Bachleitner, Sahul Flores, Jr. Patti Mann, and others.
COMMENTS
AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT: None were
given.
CONSENT AGENDA: MOTION by Morrissette, second by
Radermacher, to approve the following Consent Agenda items:
MINUTES: Approve the Regular Meeting minutes and
Closed Session minutes of 11/8/06 and Special Meeting minutes of 11/3/06.
Continuance of Conditional Use Permits for Wiseway Motor
Freight motor freight terminals at 1300 Industrial Street and 1400 Swasey
Street and adjacent parking lots: Approve renewal
of the Conditional Use Permits for Wiseway Motor Freight for motor freight
terminals at 1300 Industrial Street and 1400 Swasey Street and adjacent parking
lots with the following conditions:
1.
Retention and maintenance of
the required berm and landscaping on the north and west side of the sites, and
required perimeter fencing
2.
No on-street parking of cabs
and trailers
3.
No advertising for the sale of
trucks
4.
The next required review held
in three years (Nov. 2009)
Continuance of Conditional Use Permit for Mills Fleet
Farm garden center,
1001 Industrial Street: Approve renewal
of the Conditional Use Permit for a seasonal sales area with temporary
structures (garden center) for Mills Fleet Farm, 1001 Industrial Street, with
the following conditions:
1. Time period shall be limited to a period from April 15 to July 15 of each year.
2.
Compliance with Fire
Inspector’s recommendations (in 1/20/03 letter)
3. The next required review held in three years (Nov. 2009)
Claims: Approve the following claims for payment:
|
Fund |
Description |
Payables |
payroll |
Totals |
|
100 |
General |
107,325.90 |
162,935.72 |
270,261.62 |
|
280 |
Park Donations |
24,844.00 |
0.00 |
24,844.00 |
|
410 |
Tax Increment Financing |
148.50 |
0.00 |
148.50 |
|
450 |
Capital Projects |
686.20 |
0.00 |
686.20 |
|
610 |
Sewer |
16,554.65 |
10,018.47 |
26,573.12 |
|
620 |
Parking Utility |
2,802.88 |
824.85 |
3,627.73 |
|
630 |
Ambulance |
7,025.03 |
7,830.66 |
14,855.69 |
|
|
Totals |
$159,387.16 |
$181,609.70 |
$340,996.86 |
Applications for Operator’s Licenses: Approve the issuance of regular
Operator’s Licenses for the period 11/21/06 through 6/30/08 to:
Lynn
P. Doucette 525 Nordic Lane Hudson, WI
Alison
G. Rice 77 Coulee Road, #229 Hudson,
WI
REPORTS
OF CITY OFFICIALS, BOARDS, COMMISSIONS: Place on file the
Semi-annual report of the Community Development Director, the Public Utility
Commission minutes of 11/14/06, and the Hudson Area Joint Library Board minutes
of 10/9/06.
Roll
call vote, all ayes (6) – MOTION CARRIED.
Quarterly Report of
the Water Utility Director:
Wyland questioned the status of flushing that is being done to clean the
water near Kinnickinnic and Wisconsin Streets;
he noted that the information was not listed in the report. Jim Frye reported that flushing was done in
the areas of 6th and Walnut and Kinnickinnic Street. He stated that in speaking with the
residents, the water quality has greatly improved. He stated the Water Department would continue this practice until
the ground freezes. He noted that the
Utility would be meeting with engineers to evaluate the distribution system,
and they would also be hired to prepare a study to make sure that the water
treatment plants are operating at peak efficiency and producing good quality
water. MOTION by Wyland, second by
Radermacher, to accept and place on file the Water Utility Quarterly
Report. All ayes (6), MOTION CARRIED.
Final Development Plans for 6,000 sq.ft. prop repair and
retail at 1820 Webster Street – Propulsion Associates/David Monahan: Community Development Director
Denny Darnold stated that the Plan Commission recommended approval with some
revisions to the plans regarding building height, retaining existing trees, and
providing a letter of credit. He
mentioned that there was a concern for breaking the street during the winter
months, and stated that completing the utility work in the spring be added as
another condition for approval.
MOTION
by O’Connell, second by Radermacher, to approve the final development plans for
Propulsion Associates at 1820 Webster Street, with the following conditions:
1.
Plans are revised to denote
the proposed change in building height and provision of valley gutter along the
east property line.
2.
Two additional 2˝” caliper
overstory trees be provided between the west
property line and the building, or save two existing trees of similar
size.
3.
Plans be revised per the City
Engineer’s recommendations, and a Letter of
Credit of $8,640 is provided to assure the repair of street,
curb and gutter and boulevard
improvements, and payment of associated City inspection costs.
4.
The utility work will be completed in the spring.
Brief
discussion was held regarding the appearance of the proposed building. It was noted that many of the buildings
have metal siding, or a combination of stone and metal, and the new building
should blend in well with the area.
Vote
taken, all ayes (6), MOTION CARRIED.
Fire Department request to purchase a Hazardous Materials
Trailer: President O’Malley noted that the Finance Committee
recommended approval. Fire Chief Jim
Frye explained that earlier in the year a Fire Department vehicle was
sold. He noted that some of the
hazardous response materials used to be stored on that vehicle, and they were
now causing clutter on the apparatus floor of the Fire Station. He stated that they would like to purchase
a covered trailer to store the equipment, noting that most of the materials
could be stored outside. He explained
that the funding could come from the proceeds of the vehicle that was
sold. It was noted that the materials
are for hazardous abatement, diking materials, absorbent pads, booms,
trashcans, etc. He noted that he would
advertise for bids for the trailer, if given approval to proceed.
motion by Radermacher, second
by O’Connell, to approve the Fire Department purchase of a hazardous materials
storage trailer and supplies not to exceed $14,000, (using
funds from the sale of the one-ton mini-pumper). All ayes (6), MOTION CARRIED.
Application of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. for Class
“B” beer and Class C wine license d/b/a Chipotle Mexican Grill at 1021
Pearson Drive, Hudson, WI: president
O’Malley stated that the applicants were only seeking a beer license. Attorney Joan Bachleitner explained
that she was representing Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. She noted that Area Manager Patti Mann and
liquor agent Sahul Flores were present to answer any questions. O’Malley reported that the Finance Committee
recommended approval.
MOTION by
Radermacher, second by O’Connell, to approve the issuance of a Class
B beer license to Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
d/b/a Chipotle Mexican Grill at 1021 Pearson Drive, Hudson, WI for the period
11/21/06 to 6/30/07. It was clarified
that this was the last beer license available in the City. Clerk Korson explained that two beer
licenses were approved for businesses that were currently not operating, and
they could become available at renewal time next June. Another increase in the number of licenses
could occur through Council’s decision to change the restrictions, or through a
population increase (in October or November of 2007) that would make another
license available. Vote taken: all ayes (6), MOTION CARRIED.
Update
on Projects: BRA
Engineer Angela Popenhagen reported that Prairie View Center, Prairie Pointe Professional
Center, the Hudson Hospital and Croix Commercial projects were all
completed. She noted that most of the
other projects were wrapped up for the season, as the bituminous plants were
closed.
Bids for Lakefront Park Riverwalk
Lighting Project: Ms. Popenhagen explained
that three bids were received; the base bid included lights on both sides of
the walkway, and the alternate included lighting only on the north side. MOTION by Radermacher, second by Wyland to
approve the Park Board’s recommendation of accepting the bid from Simon
Electric Construction Co., Inc. in the amount of $96,682.00 for Alternate No. 1
of the Lakefront Park Riverwalk Lighting Project, with funds from the $100,000
that was set aside from the last bond issue.
Finance Officer Betty Caruso explained that the funds from the 2005 bond
issue were available for the lighting project.
Brief discussion was held regarding the 2005 bond issue
designated for Capital Projects.
O’Malley noted that the total cost of the Lighting Project was
anticipated to be $112,000 and he questioned the source for the additional
$16,000. Ms. Caruso explained that the
entire Riverwalk Project included the shelter facility, lighting, and
utilities, and together they would create a shortfall of approximately
$172,000. She noted that approximately
$145,000 of bond proceeds from the Lakefront Wall Project could be applied,
leaving a balance of $27,568.
Discussion was held concerning the possible use of the extra
funds from the Lakefront Wall project for other areas of need throughout the
City. O’Malley reminded that the
current topic was only the Lighting Project.
Public Works and Parks Director Jim Eulberg reported that there were
other potential savings for the Lighting Project if the City purchased the
poles directly from the vendor. It was
noted that the low bid of $96,682.00 would remain. Attorney Munkittrick cautioned about other types of municipal
contracts and possible problems with warranties and other issues. She advised Council to only deal with the
bids for the project as advertised and presented. She noted that Council could decide whether to wait and look at
all of the proposed Capital Projects at one time.
In answer to additional questions, Ms. Caruso responded that the
2005 bond proceeds must be spent by May of 2007. She noted that 90% needed to be spent by December of 2006. The expiration times for the bids were also
noted. Koch questioned whether the
lighting project would be safer if light poles were on both sides. Radermacher noted that the lumens would be
the same and the Park Board did not believe it would be worth $20,000 to have
the poles on both sides. Jim Eulberg
stated that the poles would be moved slightly closer to achieve uniform
lighting, and the cost savings would be achieved because wiring would only have
to be installed on one side of the walkway.
Vote taken, all ayes (6), MOTION CARRIED.
Bids for Lakefront Park Tollgate Shelter Project: Ms.
Popenhagen reported that eight bids were opened on Thursday, September 8th,
and the low bidder was Willow River Construction, LLC in the amount of
$253,673.00. She stated that the bids
would expire in one week. Ms.
Popenhagen explained that $50,000 had been donated by the Hudson Rotary Clubs,
the DNR had awarded a $100,000 grant, the City matched the $50,000 Rotary
donation, plus almost $62,000 in miscellaneous donations, for a total of
approximately $262,000 allocated for the project at this time.
Discussion
was held regarding the source of the miscellaneous donations and the
possibility of funds from Rep. Ron Kind that could be used to replace the Park
donations accounts. MOTION by
O’Connell, second by O’Malley, to deny awarding the contract for the Lakefront
Park Tollgate Shelter Project. Attorney
Munkittrick noted that all the bids would soon expire. Radermacher stated that most of the Shelter
Project money was in place except for approximately $15,500 that the Park Board
recommended taking from the Park A Trust Fund, an Impact Fee fund, to cover the
rest of the cost.
Wyland
questioned whether the Shelter Project could be approved or considered without
the water and sewer. Discussion was
held concerning the water and sewer estimated costs and the extra funds from
the Lakefront Wall project. Finance
Officer Betty Caruso clarified that bonds are issued with specific projects in
mind. If project costs are higher,
additional funds must be found; if costs are less, the bond funds can be
released. She explained that the City
issued $50,000 in bonds to match the Rotary Club donation for the project. With the addition of $100,000 from the DNR,
and $61,000 from all the Park donations received over the years, the project
would still be short $15,000. The
$15,000 could come from Park Dedication Impact Fees from the north side of the
City.
Discussion was held regarding the possible
use of the $145,000 from the Lakefront Wall Project for other Capital Projects. Radermacher noted that the Park Board had
given top priority to the Riverwalk Project.
O’Malley called attention to the tight budget, the levy limits
established by the State, and fiscal responsibility. He noted other City buildings that needed updating and he
questioned whether it would be wise for the City to spend all the money on only
one project at this time. It was noted
that over $3 million in requests from Department Heads could not be honored;
and other City projects would have to be cut.
Angela
Popenhagen noted that the bids could be held for only 60 days, and the time was
nearly up. Attorney Munkittrick stated
that the project would probably have to be rebid. President O’Malley restated that the intent was not to “kill the
project” but to hold a Capital Project Outlay meeting to determine the
priorities of the City. Radermacher
restated that he believed the money was available, and he hoped that the
Riverwalk project would get done. Koch
noted that the possibility that the money for the sewer and water portion could
be spent elsewhere.
Further
discussion was held concerning water and sewer installation, the use of holding
tanks, or other solutions and possible costs.
O’Connell suggested further review and discussion at a later date. MOTION restated by O’Connell, second by
O’Malley, to deny awarding the bid for the Lakefront Park Tollgate Shelter
Project, until the Capital Outlay/Project meeting has been held on December 18th. It was noted that no grant funds or awards
would be lost. Vote: Ayes(4); Noes:(2) Radermacher and Morrissette MOTION
CARRIED.
Request of Mark Christoffersen (d/b/a
Golf Links) for an ordinance to create a new class of beer license – proposed
Ordinance No. 18-06: Attorney
Munkittrick called attention to her memo of 11/17/06 and noted that several
issues needed to be discussed. She
reported that after learning how to proceed, she would prepare the ordinance in
a more final form for possible first reading at the next Council meeting.
Morrissette suggested a percentage of 30% be inserted under item
“c” under the definition for recreation premises. Attorney Munkittrick suggested discussion of the entire
ordinance, and following conclusion, Council could direct her how to prepare
the ordinance draft, with suggested changes.
Another option would be to vote not to proceed any further. She did not recommend suspending the rules
to adopt the current draft, as it had so many blanks and was not a completed
version at this time. She noted that
adoption this evening would not give any opportunity for public comment on the
various issues.
O’Connell thanked Attorney Munkittrick for providing the
information that he had requested at the previous meeting. He explained that he had researched and
reviewed the issue further. MOTION by
O’Connell, second by O’Malley, to retain the current Municipal Code and not
proceed any further with a change to the Class B beer license
requirements. O’Connell noted that he
had studied the ordinances from other cities and he did not feel comfortable
making a change at this time.
Morrissette stated that the physical business of the requestor
would not be a bar. O’Connell stated
that he feared such a change would open the City to many more license
requests. It was questioned if the St.
Croix Rowing Club would fall under the “yachting club” designation. In answer to questions, Attorney
Munkittrick explained that the definition of recreation premises under section
c (golf, tennis, curling, ski jumping or yachting) was simply reflecting a
permit whereby the Legislature allows the Department of Revenue to issue a beer
permit to those types of private clubs open only to members and located only in
municipalities that do not issue Class B beer licenses. She stated that those classifications have
nothing to do with the Statutes that the City uses for operations. Ms. Munkittrick explained the definition of
private clubs from Wisconsin Statutes, and noted that a for-profit business
would not qualify as a private club.
It was noted that the simulated golf business was not eligible
for a license under City Code, and unfortunately that fact was overlooked by
both the applicant and the City when it was originally granted a beer
license. O’Malley stated that he did
not see a need for this ordinance and that the City has enough trouble
monitoring the current licenses. He
called attention to the need for more licensed bartenders in some businesses,
and did not see a need to create another classification that could possibly be
even harder to monitor. Discussion was
held regarding adult amusements, pool halls, and other recreational
arcades. Morrissette stated he did not
see the harm in the ordinance, and called attention to bowling alleys that
offer family recreation and also serve beer.
Koch agreed that it was unfortunate that a beer license was issued in
the past, but she did not see the need for a change in reaction to one
business. She also commented that, in
this case, she did not see the need.
Attorney Munkittrick
reminded the Council to look at the classifications and decide whether this was
what they wanted for the City. She
stated that Council should make a judgment call on whether there was a public
need, and not based on the fact that a license was issued by mistake. She added that the creation of a new class
of business eligible for beer licenses could be a problem in the future.
Don Christoffersen of Bruce Wisconsin, explained that he was a
former City resident and also an investor in the Golf Links business owned by
his son Mark. He reviewed the services that they offer for golf players during
the winter. He stated that the facility
contained very expensive equipment, and they used licensed bartenders when they
previously had a beer license. He
invited the Council members to visit the Golf Links facility and pleaded with
them to reconsider and not overlook their business.
O’Malley thanked Mr. Christoffersen for his comments and agreed
that the issue this evening was not specifically his son’s establishment, and
the City had no problems in the past with that business. The MOTION was restated by O’Connell to
direct Attorney Munkittrick to stop any further work on an ordinance to create
a new beer classification. Ayes: (4);
Noes: (2) Morrissette and Radermacher.
MOTION CARRIED.
Vine
Street Corridor Traffic Study: o’Malley introduced Mr. Sheldon Johnson, a traffic
specialist with the City’s consulting engineering firm of Bonestroo and
Associates. Mr. Johnson reported that
BRA was requested to conduct a traffic study of the Vine Street corridor
between Second Street and Carmichael Road.
He provided a brief overview of the final report that included traffic
volume data, peak period traffic counts at three intersections, crash data
analysis, pedestrian counts at intersections, travel time runs during peak
times, travel time runs on alternative routes, and service level analysis.
Mr. Johnson explained
that the corridor functioned at an acceptable level of service to handle 12,500
to 13,000 vehicles per day. Current volume
was approximately 10,700 vehicles per day near Carmichael Road, tapering down
to approximately 7,000 vehicles per day near Second Street. He noted that the pedestrian load at the
intersections along Vine was not heavy; most of the pedestrians were found at
the Wisconsin Street intersection and appeared to be school related
groups. Mr. Johnson explained that
technically the Diamond Drive and Grandview Drive intersections would not
warrant four-way stops according to the State, however other factors have to be
considered. He called attention to the
numbers of student pedestrians and drivers at the Wisconsin Street
intersection, and stated that Grandview Drive was also an important collector
roadway.
Mr. Johnson stated that
the traffic numbers at Diamond Drive do not suggest all-way stop control, and
if the City decides to remove the stop signs, some improvements for pedestrians
must be made to the intersection.
Various options were noted. He
also called attention to the drivers that continue to make “rolling stops” at
Diamond Drive as they turn in toward the YMCA.
Mr. Johnson stressed that public education was needed for both drivers
and pedestrians.
It was noted that the Wisconsin/Vine Street
intersection had a safety issue with more crashes than usual. Mr. Johnson stated that the all-way stop was
appropriate, however, the City could consider a roundabout intersection that
would remove delays and virtually eliminate the number of crashes in that area.
In summary, Mr. Johnson explained that the
Vine Street corridor basically was working well, but additional delays were
caused by the Diamond Drive stop sign.
He noted that Council had a difficult decision to make regarding the
Diamond Drive and Wisconsin Street intersections, and many issues needed to be
considered. He suggested that the Third
and Fourth Street stop signs should remain in place. The use of medians and
signage were also discussed.
MOTION by O’Connell, second by Radermacher,
to refer the Vine Street Corridor Traffic Study to the Public Safety Committee
for further review and recommendations.
President O’Malley asked for comments from the audience.
Mike Culver, 2241 Ruby Road, stated he was
representing the Vine Hills neighborhood and expressed their hope that the
Diamond Drive stop signs would remain.
He reported that he had not noticed any increase in traffic on Diamond
Drive, or increase in the lines or queues, and noted concern for the fast speed
of the traffic on Carmichael Road.
Administrator Willi stated that traffic delays were frequent on
Carmichael Road in the mornings when students are being driven to school, in
the afternoons when school is over, and during other school events. Mr. Culver
stated that he believed most parents would feel safer if their children crossed
a street that has a stop sign rather than
using pedestrian flags. Vote
taken, all ayes (6), MOTION CARRIED.
Ordinance No. 17-06 re: 2007
Appropriations for Municipal Operations: Administrator
Devin Willi noted that the total budget for 2007, including debt service, was
$8,438,623, a decrease of approximately 3% from last year. He stated that the tax levy limit reduced
the amount the City could spend, and also that the debt levy was less than it
was in 2006. Mr. Willi explained that
expenditures were cut in many areas, and increased where needed. Under revenues, he reported a major decrease
of approximately $145,000 in building inspection fees, as building in the City
has slowed down.
Mr. Willi explained
that approximately $245,000 represented what could be considered short-term
Capital Projects; these items might not have the life span to justify bonding
for 10 or 20 years. The list included
park benches, squad vehicles, Comprehensive Plan costs, copy machine, etc.
Mr. Willi noted that the
final assessed valuation would not be known until after the Board of Review
meetings on November 28th and 29th. He reported that they used a number
approximately $20 million lower than the actual final amount, and stated the
valuation should be around $1.5 billion, up approximately one-third. He noted that if a property owner’s assessed
valuation increased less than 50%, their property taxes would either be the
same or go down. The City’s mill rate
would be going down from 5.85 to 3.98 because the assessed valuation was going
up, and equalized and assessed values would be the same, close to 100%.
Mr. Willi
explained that last year the total mill rate was $21.67 and this year it was
estimated to be between $14.00 and $14.50.
He noted that it was anticipated that $2.6 million would be going into
the TIF District this year, for a total in ten years of almost $12 million.
Finance Officer
Betty Caruso called attention to the Fund Balance and its need to be
monitored. She noted that in the 2007
budget, $160,000 was still needed to cover all expenditures, and this would
come from the Fund Balance. She called
attention to a 2006 deficit that was estimated at $128,000 to be funded by the
Fund Balance. Ms. Caruso explained that
the actual deficit was closer to $267,000, as a result of lower collections
from building permits, and other budget overruns. She noted that with the levy limits in place, there was no way
to replenish the funds in the Fund Balance.
She again stressed that the Fund Balance must be closely monitored.
Ms. Caruso stated that the amount of
the Fund Balance (unreserved) currently
was $1,333,000 but at the end of 2007 it would be at $1,017,000 – a drop of
$300,000 in a two-year period. She
noted that in 2005 the Undesignated Fund Balance was 25% of the City’s budget,
a good healthy position that allowed Moody’s Investor Service to increase our
bond rating from A2 to A1. She stated
that the Fund Balance was now close to 15% of the budget, and called attention
to the percentages in other communities.
She explained that the City was not in a danger zone at this time, but
this needed to be addressed.
Ms. Caruso
explained that at the December 18th Council meeting the plans for
the TIF District would be addressed, as well as the Fund Balance and what
action could be taken if the tax levy limits were eliminated. She again stressed the importance of
maintaining the Fund Balance at a minimum of 15% of total operations. Ms. Caruso reported that short-term notes
of approximately $240,000 were built into the current budget to cover some of
the items explained earlier by Administrator Willi. She requested authorization to proceed and obtain bids from
banks for this short-term financing for Capital Outlay, with payoff expected in
March of 2007.
MOTION by
O’Connell, second by Radermacher, to suspend the rules toward adoption of
Ordinance No. 17-06. Koch noted concern
for more public input on the budget.
Administrator Willi stated that the budget had been available for nearly
a month and the required hearing notice was published twice. Roll call vote,
Ayes (4), Noes: (2) Wyland, Koch – MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by O’Connell, second by Radermacher to approve the
following:
ORDINANCE NO. 17-06
2007 APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE OF
$8,438,623
WITH TAX LEVY OF $5,293,304
(Copy on file in Clerk’s office)
All ayes (6),
MOTION CARRIED.
Correspondence from Cedar Corporation re: engineering
needs: denny Darnold noted that the 2007
engineering rates for BRA would be discussed soon. MOTION by Radermacher, second by O’Connell, to direct
Administrator Willi to create a Request for Proposals for engineering services
for the City. All ayes, MOTION CARRIED.
Reappointment
of Barbara Burke to Hudson Housing Authority: President O’Malley noted
that Mayor Breault has recommended reappointment of Barbara Burke to another
term on the Hudson Housing Authority.
MOTION by Radermacher, second by O’Connell to confirm Mayor Breault’s
reappointment of Barbara Burke, 2304 Donegal Court, for another five-year term
on the Hudson Housing Authority ending in July of 2011. All ayes (6), MOTION CARRIED.
COMMUNICATIONS AND ITEMS
FOR FUTURE AGENDAS:
President O’Malley thanked everyone for their patience in attending the
long meeting for a full airing of all the issues.
Morrissette noted that the holiday
decorations in the City looked great; he thanked the Public Works Department
for their work, as well as all the businesses that contributed.
MOTION by Wyland, second by
O’Connell, to adjourn at 9:20 p.m. All
ayes (6). MOTION CARRIED.
Nancy Korson, City Clerk
I hereby
certify that the City Clerk has submitted the foregoing minutes to me, and I
hereby by my signature approve said minutes and all acts of the Common Council
as sent forth therein.
Scot E. O’Malley, Council President